The field of Media Linguistics emerges as a critical discipline that examines language in its multifaceted manifestation across digital and print media. This paper delves into the complexities of analyzing language in these mediums, highlighting the unique characteristics and challenges each presents. In the realm of digital media, the rapid evolution of communication platforms has necessitated an understanding of the linguistic nuances of social media, online forums, and digital advertisements. Print media, on the other hand, continues to offer rich linguistic data through newspapers, magazines, and books. The analysis of these media types reveals distinct linguistic strategies, such as the use of hyperbole and metaphors in digital communication, and the formal structure of printed texts. The paper further explores the implications of these linguistic practices on audience reception, discourse formation, and cultural representation. By examining language use in media, this study underscores the importance of Media Linguistics in understanding the social and cultural dynamics of our contemporary information landscape.
Jackson, D. Media LinguisticsAnalyzing Language in Digital and Print Media. Frontiers of Language and Communication Studies, 2021, 3, 21. https://doi.org/10.69610/j.flcs.20210817
AMA Style
Jackson D. Media LinguisticsAnalyzing Language in Digital and Print Media. Frontiers of Language and Communication Studies; 2021, 3(2):21. https://doi.org/10.69610/j.flcs.20210817
Chicago/Turabian Style
Jackson, Daniel 2021. "Media LinguisticsAnalyzing Language in Digital and Print Media" Frontiers of Language and Communication Studies 3, no.2:21. https://doi.org/10.69610/j.flcs.20210817
APA style
Jackson, D. (2021). Media LinguisticsAnalyzing Language in Digital and Print Media. Frontiers of Language and Communication Studies, 3(2), 21. https://doi.org/10.69610/j.flcs.20210817
Article Metrics
Article Access Statistics
References
Burbules, N. C., & Callister, T. A. (2000). Watch IT: The Risks and Promises of Information Technologies for Education. Westview Press.
Haralambos, M., & Heffernan, M. (1996). Sociology: Exploring the City. Polity Press.
Chomsky, N. (1980). Rules and Representations. MIT Press.
Herring, S. C., Scheidel, C., & Wright, E. (2004). Rhetorical functions in computer-mediated communication: A review of the literature. Language and Communication, 24(3), 237-266.
Barzilay, R., & Chodorow, M. (2004). From words to thought: lexical analysis of cultural concepts. Computational Linguistics, 30(3), 355-396.
Chafe, W. (1982). The development of communicative competence. In R. T. Kellogg (Ed.), Language in society (pp. 17-40). University of Chicago Press.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. Edward Arnold.
Leech, G., & Short, M. (1981). Style in language. Longman.
Crystal, D. (2000). The Cambridge encyclopedia of language. Cambridge University Press.
Foss, S. K., Foss, C. K., & Trapp, R. (2000). Contemporary perspectives on rhetoric (2nd ed.). Waveland Press.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A sociological approach. Sage Publications.