The title "Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Bridging the Gap in Global Communication" emphasizes the importance of understanding the complexities of language use and communication across different cultural contexts. In this paper, we explore the field of cross-cultural pragmatics, which focuses on the manner in which cultural norms, values, and practices influence the way people communicate. By examining various aspects of pragmatics, such as politeness, implicature, and conversational implicature, this study seeks to shed light on the challenges and opportunities that arise when individuals from diverse backgrounds engage in dialogue. The aim is to provide insights into effective strategies for intercultural communication that can help reduce misunderstandings and foster mutual understanding. The analysis involves a comparative study of communication patterns in different cultures, with a particular emphasis on the differences in verbal and nonverbal communication. Additionally, the paper discusses the role of language education in equipping individuals with the necessary skills to navigate cross-cultural interactions successfully. Through a multidisciplinary approach that combines linguistic theory with cultural studies, this paper highlights the significance of cross-cultural pragmatics in an increasingly globalized world.
Smith, D. Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Bridging the Gap in Global Communication. Frontiers of Language and Communication Studies, 2019, 1, 5. https://doi.org/10.69610/j.flcs.20191230
AMA Style
Smith D. Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Bridging the Gap in Global Communication. Frontiers of Language and Communication Studies; 2019, 1(1):5. https://doi.org/10.69610/j.flcs.20191230
Chicago/Turabian Style
Smith, Daniel 2019. "Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Bridging the Gap in Global Communication" Frontiers of Language and Communication Studies 1, no.1:5. https://doi.org/10.69610/j.flcs.20191230
APA style
Smith, D. (2019). Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Bridging the Gap in Global Communication. Frontiers of Language and Communication Studies, 1(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.69610/j.flcs.20191230
Article Metrics
Article Access Statistics
References
Burbules, N. C., & Callister, T. A. (2000). Watch IT: The Risks and Promises of Information Technologies for Education. Westview Press.
Schutz, J. A. (1966). The Need for a Basic Theory of Interpersonal Communication. In P. W. Fielding (Ed.), The Interpersonal Communication Reader (pp. 1-13). Aldine.
Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse Strategies. Cambridge University Press.
Byrne, D. (1986). Thought and Language. Cambridge University Press.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. In E. Tajfel (Ed.), Social Identity and Intergroup Relations (pp. 7-24). Cambridge University Press.
Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and Assessing Intercultural Competence. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Kramsch, C. (1998). Language and Culture: Misunderstandings Lost and Found. Oxford University Press.
Wierzbicka, A. (1998). Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: The Semantics of Human Communication. Oxford University Press.
Giles, H., Coupland, N., & Coupland, J. (1991). The Context of Language: Social and Psycholinguistic Perspectives. Cambridge University Press.
Lustig, M. W., & Liu, W. (1998). The Culture of Close Relationships. University of California Press.
Ting-Toomey, S. (1988). Communication in Cross-Cultural Encounters. Sage Publications.
