Journal Article

Computational Approaches to Syntax: Advances and Applications

by Sophia Martin 1,*
1
Sophia Martin
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
FLCS  2019, 3; 1(1), 3; https://doi.org/10.69610/j.flcs.20191030
Received: 30 August 2019 / Accepted: 26 September 2019 / Published Online: 30 October 2019

Abstract

The field of computational approaches to syntax has experienced significant advancements over the past few decades, transforming both the study of linguistic phenomena and the development of practical applications. This paper outlines the evolution of computational syntax, focusing on the innovations that have propelled the field forward. It begins by examining the foundational computational models of Noam Chomsky and the later developments of transformational-generative grammar, which laid the groundwork for syntax-based computational analysis. Subsequently, the paper delves into the advent of statistical and corpus-based methods, which have expanded the scope of syntax research and facilitated more robust linguistic analysis. The integration of machine learning techniques has further enhanced predictive models and allowed for the automatic parsing of complex linguistic structures. The applications of these computational methods are broad, ranging from natural language processing to computational linguistics and even to neuroscience. The paper concludes by highlighting the potential future directions for computational syntax, emphasizing the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration for continued advancements.


Copyright: © 2019 by Martin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

Share and Cite

ACS Style
Martin, S. Computational Approaches to Syntax: Advances and Applications. Frontiers of Language and Communication Studies, 2019, 1, 3. https://doi.org/10.69610/j.flcs.20191030
AMA Style
Martin S. Computational Approaches to Syntax: Advances and Applications. Frontiers of Language and Communication Studies; 2019, 1(1):3. https://doi.org/10.69610/j.flcs.20191030
Chicago/Turabian Style
Martin, Sophia 2019. "Computational Approaches to Syntax: Advances and Applications" Frontiers of Language and Communication Studies 1, no.1:3. https://doi.org/10.69610/j.flcs.20191030
APA style
Martin, S. (2019). Computational Approaches to Syntax: Advances and Applications. Frontiers of Language and Communication Studies, 1(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.69610/j.flcs.20191030

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

References

  1. Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic Structures. Mouton, The Hague.
  2. Backus, J. W. (1959). The syntax directed compiler. Communications of the ACM, 2(5), 364-366.
  3. Knuth, D. E., Morris, J. H., & Pratt, V. R. (1965). On the closure properties of context-free languages. Journal of the ACM, 12(4), 501-515.
  4. Gazdar, G., Klein, E., & Pullum, G. K. (1985). Introduction to transformational generative grammar. Blackwell.
  5. Montague, R. (1970). Formal philosophy: Selected papers. Yale University Press.
  6. Kay, P., & Corder, E. K. (1991). Using corpora in linguistics. Cambridge University Press.
  7. Collins, M., & Young, S. (1999). A Bayesian approach to learning probabilistic context-free grammars. Computational Linguistics, 25(2), 267-281.
  8. Bengio, Y., Courville, A., & Vincent, P. (2012). Representation learning: A review and new perspectives. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 35(8), 1798-1828.
  9. Chomsky, N. (2002). The�ory of syntax (4th ed.). MIT Press.